<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kansas City Criminal Defense Lawyer &#187; DUI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/category/dui/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com</link>
	<description>Johnson County &#38; Kansas City Criminal Defense Attorney</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:17:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chief Justice Says State DUI Ruling Dangerous</title>
		<link>http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/chief-justice-says-state-dui-ruling-dangerous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/chief-justice-says-state-dui-ruling-dangerous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police. anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chief Justice Says State DUI Ruling Dangerous, but Supreme Court declines to hear case and clarify ruling in DUI anonymous tip case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com%2Fchief-justice-says-state-dui-ruling-dangerous%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com%2Fchief-justice-says-state-dui-ruling-dangerous%2F&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;service_api=davematson%3AR_cc759c7a18140eda5f147d1f00d34c10&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>The US Supreme Court as a whole decided not to take up a Virginia case that decided an anonymous call is not sufficient evidence by itself for police to pull over a car.<span id="more-92"></span>But Chief Justice John Roberts indicated that he wanted to the court to take on the case and made the rule clear for all states. Currently 3 other states don&#8217;t allow anonymous phone calls to so-called &#8220;Drunk Busters Hotlines&#8221; to be the sole basis for the police to track down and stop a driver on the highway.</p>
<p>This article in the <a href="http://www.startribune.com/nation/64983802.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUsZ">Star Tribune</a> notes that Roberts believes the Virginia court decision grants people &#8220;one free swerve&#8221; before being stopped, and that this is dangerous to public safety.</p>
<p>Crime Scene KC <a href="http://blogs.kansascity.com/crime_scene/2009/10/is-a-tipsters-word-enough-to-justify-a-traffic-stop.html">asks</a> &#8220;Is a tipster&#8217;s word enough to justify a traffic stop?&#8221; In Kansas and Missouri, under the law, it absolutely is. But is that fair?</p>
<p>Is it truly a significant burden to either a) require a tipster to leave their name and contact information, or b) have a police officer actually observe someone engaging in dangerous driving or other traffic violations before pulling them over?</p>
<p>Anonymous calls to police have implications in more than just <a href="http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/criminal-offenses/dui/">DUI cases</a>. Allowing anonymous tips without any corroboration is practically inviting abuse and governmental overreach. With this standard, the police can essentially pull anyone over for any reason, chalking it up to an &#8220;anonymous&#8221; tip, that they can either make up or manufacturer themselves.</p>
<p>And this is unfortunately the law in Kansas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/chief-justice-says-state-dui-ruling-dangerous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kansas DUI and Theft of Ambulance Charged</title>
		<link>http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/kansas-dui-ambulance-theft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/kansas-dui-ambulance-theft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the most unusual Kansas DUI story of the week, and man was arrested after stealing an ambulance in Lawrence. Apparently, in his mental state this seemed like the most logical way to get himself home.The Topeka Capital-Journal reports that the ambulance was responding to a medical emergency down the street from where the man [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com%2Fkansas-dui-ambulance-theft%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com%2Fkansas-dui-ambulance-theft%2F&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;service_api=davematson%3AR_cc759c7a18140eda5f147d1f00d34c10&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>In the most unusual Kansas DUI story of the week, and man was arrested after stealing an ambulance in Lawrence. Apparently, in his mental state this seemed like the most logical way to get himself home.<span id="more-89"></span>The Topeka Capital-Journal <a href="http://cjonline.com/news/state/2009-10-12/man_steals_lawrence_ambulance">reports</a> that the ambulance was responding to a medical emergency down the street from where the man had allegedly been drinking.</p>
<p>He was quickly stopped and charged with both <a href="http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/criminal-offenses/dui/">DUI</a> and <a href="http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/criminal-offenses/shoplifting-theft/">theft</a> of items valued at over $100,000. The theft charge is actually much more serious. It is a felony offense under Kansas law, and he could be facing years in prison as a result of this unfortunate escapade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/kansas-dui-ambulance-theft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kansas Considering ‘No Refusal’ DUI Weekends</title>
		<link>http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/kansas-considering-%e2%80%98no-refusal%e2%80%99-dui-weekends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/kansas-considering-%e2%80%98no-refusal%e2%80%99-dui-weekends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In many states across the country law enforcement has taken the option to refuse a DUI breath test away on some weekends. Kansas law enforcement officials are looking at including this type of crackdowns in their arsenal as well. A ‘No Refusal’ weekend works to cut down on people refusing breathalyzer tests when stopped on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com%2Fkansas-considering-%25e2%2580%2598no-refusal%25e2%2580%2599-dui-weekends%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com%2Fkansas-considering-%25e2%2580%2598no-refusal%25e2%2580%2599-dui-weekends%2F&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly&amp;service_api=davematson%3AR_cc759c7a18140eda5f147d1f00d34c10&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>In many states across the country law enforcement has taken the option to refuse a DUI breath test away on some weekends. Kansas law enforcement officials are looking at including this type of crackdowns in their arsenal as well.<span id="more-87"></span></p>
<p>A ‘No Refusal’ weekend works to cut down on people refusing breathalyzer tests when stopped on <a href="http://www.missouri-criminal-defense.com/kansas-dui.htm">suspicion of DUI</a>. Officials in our state are concerned that the rate of refusals is rising and wants to put a stop to that trend.</p>
<p>If they go forward with it, law enforcement would be able to get a warrant from a judge in order to draw blood in the case of a refusal, essentially taking away the person’s right to refuse and ensuring the police have the evidence they want. Prosecutors will be on call to file motions upon someone&#8217;s arrest, and judges will be on call to sign these motions, compelling a blood test on the spot, to test for BAC (Blood Alcohol Content) levels.</p>
<p>Critics worry that this infringes on people’s rights and is way too invasive. As <a href="http://www.kwch.com/Global/story.asp?S=11172376">this report</a> from KWCH states, a breath test isn’t necessary for a conviction in a DUI case and using warrants to get blood draws seems quite extreme.</p>
<p>It ca be common for someone with a previous  DUI arrests to refuse to submit to a breath test. Kansas officials want to compel defendants to provide this evidence. They want to ensure drunk drivers are arrested and cases brought before the courts are easier for the prosecutors to get a conviction.</p>
<p>It makes sense that refusals rise as individuals are arrested for DUI multiple times. The penalties for DUI grow quite rapidly as your consecutive convictions mount.</p>
<p>For instance, a first time DUI charge can get you up to 6 months in jail, fines, and a 30 day license suspension. However, your second DUI can get you up to 1 year in jail, a 1 year suspension, and a <a href="http://www.missouri-criminal-defense.com/kansas-dui-faqs.htm">mandatory ignition interlock device</a> installed once your license is reinstated.</p>
<p>Your <a href="http://www.missouri-criminal-defense.com/kansas-dui.htm">third DUI</a> can be charged as a felony. This is a title you will carry the rest of your life. As a convicted felon you may have a harder time getting a job and approved for rental property.</p>
<p>DUI cases are taken very seriously in Kansas and the consideration of ‘No Refusal’ weekends is evidence of this.</p>
<p>If you are facing charges of DUI you need an aggressive attorney fighting for you every step of the way. Whether this is your <a href="http://www.missouri-criminal-defense.com/kansas-dui.htm">first DUI case</a> or your 5<sup>th</sup>, <a href="http://www.missouri-criminal-defense.com/contactkansaslawyer.htm">call me to discuss your case immediately</a> to see how I may be able to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kansascitycriminaldefenselawyer.com/kansas-considering-%e2%80%98no-refusal%e2%80%99-dui-weekends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

